No need to pinch yourself. It's really happened: Thirteen-year Iowa offensive coordinator and twelve-year quarterbacks coach Ken O'Keefe has decided to leave the program:
"Ken O'Keefe has decided to leave our Iowa staff for another coaching opportunity," said Ferentz. "Ken's work contributed greatly to our program's success during the past 13 years, and more impressively, to the growth and development of the young men in our program. We wish Ken and Joanne the most success in this new chapter of his career."
The other "coaching opportunity" is wide receivers coach with the Miami Dolphins, which gives us the opportunity to discuss the Ken O'Keefe coaching tree. In the late 1970s, Ken O'Keefe was the head coach of Worcester Academy, a prep school in Worcester, Massachusetts. His coaching staff might have been the best high school coaching staff in history: His offensive coordinator was Mike Sherman, his defensive coordinator Kirk Ferentz. He also had a player on that team named Joe Philbin. Twenty years later, when Kirk Ferentz was named Iowa's head coach, he brought in O'Keefe as his offensive coordinator and Joe Philbin, who had spent the last two seasons as offensive coordinator at Harvard, as his offensive line coach. Philbin left after four seasons at Iowa for the vacant offensive line coach position with the Green Bay Packers under his former high school offensive coordinator, Mike Sherman. He eventually became offensive coordinator and, a couple of weeks ago, was named the head coach of the Miami Dolphins. He brought in Mike Sherman as offensive coordinator and has apparently called on his old high school head coach to join the staff now, as well.

Ken O'Keefe is almost certainly the most divisive figure in Ferentz's tenure at Iowa. His 2002 offense was a juggernaut, the highest-scoring offense in school history and the only Iowa offense to ever average more than 35 points per game in Big Ten play. That team featured the most experienced and talented offensive line in the history of the program, a set of linemen thrown to the wolves as freshmen in 1999 and built into a beastly unit in four seasons (and coached by Joe Philbin, unsurprisingly). After that, though, the results have been middling. In the last ten seasons, Iowa's offense has finished in the Big Ten's top five scoring offenses once, and that was with a Doak Walker Award-winning halfback in the backfield. Since 2004, Iowa's average conference rank in both scoring offense and total offense has been seventh. There was the disastrous 2007 season, when a young offense finished last in the conference in every relevant offensive statistic. There was 2009, when Iowa won eleven games and an Orange Bowl despite finishing tenth in the conference in scoring and total offense (and, yes, ESPN guy, there was quite deserved criticism that year). There was mediocrity everywhere else.
His playcalling was somehow both completely inexplicable and endlessly predictable. He had a tendency to take a gimmick -- the bubble screen, the throwback screen, most recently the end around -- and run it into the ground. He would take a simple concept and strip out the thing that made it effective in the first place (the multiple-formation no-huddle that Iowa used early this season is a prime example; for reasons passing understanding, Iowa took the no-huddle offense to Penn State and ran every play from the same three-wide formation, so that Penn State's defense was not stuck with inappropriate personnel packages for defensing the offense). There was a playbook so limited that Iowa was reduced to drawing a slant pattern in the dirt at the end of the 2009 Michigan State game because there wasn't a slant in that week's playbook.
And yet, as a player developer, Ken O'Keefe was fantastic. He turned JUCO journeymen like Brad Banks and Nathan Chandler into top conference quarterbacks. He made something out of Kyle McCann. He had Big Ten defenses trembling in fear of Drew Tate. And he turned a two-star afterthought into the winningest Iowa quarterback since the 1960s and a cult hero. Ken never had premium talent (the one time he did, it was a disaster), but he certainly made the most of what he had, which is why we think his new position is perfect for him. If you stripped the playcalling duties out of O'Keefe's tenure at Iowa, he was as effective an assistant coach as Kirk Ferentz has had. The criticism was so loud only because the thing he struggled with the most was also the most visible component of his job.
We'll get to the potential replacements shortly, but Godspeed You Ken O'Keefe, and best wishes in the future.
2 recs | 109 comments
Who will it be?
Please begin the speculation this is killing me. Is there any chance Caldwell ends up in Iowa?
Squawkeye - February 4, 2012
It's KILLING you?
Did you want me to call 911?
mikjones24 - February 4, 2012
I can call
Quick, what’s the number?
kurthy - February 4, 2012 via mobile
thanks for the insight Mike, you really are a class act
Squawkeye - February 4, 2012
Ahahahaha
hkobb7 - February 4, 2012
I don't think we need Vint to start speculation. We can start our own rumors
For instance, I heard that HockeyBear is available. Will KF make the call? I have no idea
rupertj - February 4, 2012
If you don't like Bielema's personality then
YOU DO NOT WANT HOCKEYBEAR.
SomeJerkPoster - February 4, 2012
Hockeybear doesn't "nicely discuss" recruiting problems with opposing coaches.
He gets in an F-16 and sends a nuclear bomb to the home of that coach. One bomb for each star of each competed-for recruit. Urban Meyer’s house would be a 2-mile-deep smoldering crater right now.
WaterlooChazz - February 4, 2012
No
NorseHawk - February 4, 2012
with all the scuttlebutt around David Raih
finding a permanent spot I wonder if Jason Manson gets a shot at GA
PSD - February 4, 2012
Jason Manson graduated from Iowa University
Was he in the same class as Gary Johnston?
mikjones24 - February 4, 2012
i have a class with Raih
fun fact right there.
HawkeyeBoiler - February 4, 2012
He's a Milford man!
IPeeBlackAndGold - February 4, 2012
GY!KOK
Levez Vos Skinny Playbooks Comme Antennas to Heaven!
SomeJerkPoster - February 4, 2012
A godspeed you black emperor! reference?
I am compelled to give you all the recs I have. Which is only one, I guess.
KilometersDavis - February 4, 2012
Love 'em.
Got to see them last year in Brooklyn.
SomeJerkPoster - February 4, 2012
We used to sleep on the beach here, sleep overnight. They don't sleep anymore on the beach.
kEvanson - February 4, 2012
Nate Chandler was a what now
NorseHawk - February 4, 2012
OK, that might be a stretch. Point taken.
Patrick Vint - February 4, 2012
Nobody could fall forward
for 4 yards like he could.
chitownhawkeye - February 4, 2012
No one loved watching Big Nate doof his way to a 1st down on a scramble more than me
But that dude could not hit the broad side of a barn.
NorseHawk - February 4, 2012
Now you are the one that has gone too far
Guys that can’t hit the broad side of a barn don’t win like he did. His accuracy was suspect but he was a gamer.
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
Individual players do not win games by themselves, this is the weirdest thing sports fans believe
He was on a really good team, but he was a bad QB. He barely completed 50% of his passes and overthrew poor Ramon Ochoa on a go route roughly 700 times that season.
NorseHawk - February 4, 2012
Yes, but you're discounting his contributions
I don’t think 2011 JVB wins even 8 games in that offense, for instance.
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
He didn't make a whole lot of them for me to discount
And yes I think Vandenberg absolutely could have succeeded with that defense behind him and a running game built around Freddy Russell and Robert Gallery having one of the best years a lineman has ever had. That team wasn’t winning with its passing offense
If you have to rely on cliches like “he was just a gamer!!!” you are probably defending a bad player.
NorseHawk - February 4, 2012
If you want hard facts instead of terms like 'gamer', Big Nate's stats were just fine
I think you’re being unfairly harsh to a decent player, maybe because he followed a transcendent player.
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
Completing 53% of your passes is not "just fine" at all
NorseHawk - February 4, 2012
53% says he had inadequate accuracy
but 18-10 says he worked well with it. It’s not going to set the world on fire, but it’s definitely “just fine” level.
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
So Jake Christensen was just fine?
NorseHawk - February 4, 2012
I think Nate was the epitome of what a defensive team needs:
Be decent and don’t screw up. I was just fine with that. Norse, is not.
mikjones24 - February 4, 2012
Well my argument is that he was not "decent" at all
NorseHawk - February 4, 2012
Like, those are almost identical to Jake Christensen's stats in 07
Same completion percentage, fewer yards, one more TD, four more INTs. And I don’t think anyone here was defending Jake.
NorseHawk - February 4, 2012
The YPA is a little better for Chandler (6.65 v 6.13), which was one of the main problems I had with JC6
It’s also a much more important stat than Comp%. And for the record, I was one of the people that (wrongly) thought JC6 was decent enough to earn more time his JR year.
In any case, it’s clear we disagree on how we remember Big Nate. Let’s just move on.
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
Rec'd for "doof his way to a 1st down"
Patrick Vint - February 4, 2012
I can think of no better way to describe the strange magesty that was Nate Chandler running
NorseHawk - February 4, 2012
He was like a gazelle
a frankensteinian gazelle.
chitownhawkeye - February 4, 2012
It was like watching Bambi learn how to walk
Only Bambi was built like an offensive tackle.
NorseHawk - February 4, 2012
Think of how much venison you could get from an offensive tackle
rupertj - February 4, 2012
Bambi?
Hey, remember this?
http://youtu.be/ZpBkc2jK-6w
Bucketochicken - February 4, 2012
Ever seen a giraffe try to fuck a reluctant safari jeep?
that image seems appropriate
Lycurgus - February 4, 2012
does that imply
that there are willing safari jeeps?
chitownhawkeye - February 4, 2012
Never enthusiastic, but often coy
Lycurgus - February 4, 2012
Beep means maybe
Lycurgus - February 4, 2012
Some tourists want to see The Full Africa
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
sometimes tall players look like they're moving in slow motion when they're not (Vince Young, Terelle Pryor)
Big Nate actually was moving in slow motion
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
Throwing to his giant of a brother
Helped his cause.
mikjones24 - February 4, 2012
Untrue. Scott Chandler was AWFUL that year.
He had many red-zone drops. You’re remembering his subsequent years when he became a better receiver.
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
I should have used sarcasm font, sorry
I remember watching a game in 03 and someone shouted “CHANDLER TO CHANDLER?! THAT’LL NEVER WORK!”
Sure enough, they were right.
mikjones24 - February 4, 2012
I really thought it should have worked. How many times did they run that play in the back yard?
Stats to back up your sarcasm font that I missed:
via UI player bios:
2003 was the only year he had in common with big bro. He had zero catches all year.
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
But now he's playing in the greatest football town in the world.
So I guess the jokes on us.
mikjones24 - February 4, 2012
Your sarcasm font continues to be broken
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
I know
Definitely slipping on that right now.
mikjones24 - February 4, 2012
Rollout, using a guy with foodspeed that could be timed with a sundial
Farewell, KOK, you mad playcaller you.
Blackheartnopants - February 4, 2012 via Android app
This same thing is remembered
as one of Hayden’s greatest calls
Not really disagreeing with you, just pointing that out
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
gives me goosebumps to this day
The Bacon Explosion - February 4, 2012
Oh really, Norse?
How many of these honors have YOU won?
Academic all-Big Ten . . . Coaches Appreciation Award, offense . . . selected to compete on Gridiron Classic post-season game .
/I got you good.
WaterlooChazz - February 4, 2012
And one more defense of Nate Chandler:
at least a 2 or 3 of his completions per game were intentionally 5 rows up the sideline stands, or 10 rows past the end zone, when nobody got open.
I don’t think we can say the same for Jake C.
I am a big Nate Chandler fan (literally, and figuratively).
WaterlooChazz - February 4, 2012
Maybe we see more shotgun formations next year
Not seeing it this last year defied logic. Among other things…
FiveSecondRuleChef - February 4, 2012 via mobile
Looking forward to 700 more comments to dissect this major sea change
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
There's a basketball game in an hour and a half.
That might break it up until, like, 4:00.
Patrick Vint - February 4, 2012
How 'bout this?
We NEVER scratched where it itched. Even a little of that could have been worth a win or two a season.
FiveSecondRuleChef - February 4, 2012 via mobile
Yeah, but scratching is poor hygeine.
You run one flea-flicker and as soon as you know it, you’re bit and the itch has spreadhd to everyone.
KilometersDavis - February 4, 2012
I want to read this as a MRSA joke
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
Kok had a bad case of vaginitis
But he was more worried about hygiene.
FiveSecondRuleChef - February 4, 2012 via mobile
Another damnable nautical references
I believe the correct term is “see change” . I heard that there was white smoke over Kinnick today.
Lycurgus - February 4, 2012
I had it right
per wiki. Take that, you Limey. Unless I’m missing the sarcasm. In that case, the egg is on my face.
If we’re going with white smoke references, that definitely leads to Bradley being the leader for the DC spot.
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
"See Change" as in "Holy See"
Lycurgus - February 4, 2012
Damn. Gotcha now.
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
I liked that joke.
But I also liked the use of “sea change.”
I am puzzled at why Catnuts called you a “Limey.” Unless he’s going nautical again.
WaterlooChazz - February 4, 2012
Yes, nautical theme again
it’s a term originally applied to all non-French sailors that flavored their terrible ship-board liquor with limes to form grog. (The French used fortified wine, i.e. Brandy). It eventually applied mostly to Britons because of their naval dominance, which may have been greatly aided by the lime in grog cutting down on scurvy and other terrible sea sicknesses that ravaged French ships much more than other countries.
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
I could see Bloodpunch locking Kirk and his assistants in room.
“NOW DON’T COME OUT OF THERE UNTIL YOU’VE PICKED YOUR COORDINATORS DAMMIT.”
mikjones24 - February 4, 2012
White smoke over Miami, you mean?
KilometersDavis - February 4, 2012
Yes
See Catnuts, someone gets me!
Lycurgus - February 4, 2012
I got the white smoke reference
and made a poor joke about people that harbor child molesters (Benedict & Bradley). I understood part of your comment.
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
Ooof
I am still staying a mile away from that topic. I don’t have your devil-may-care attitude about humor
Lycurgus - February 4, 2012
It's why I made the joke rather obscure.
I’m also now moving away from that topic.
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
Prudent
Lycurgus - February 4, 2012
It's too late for that!
You already passed the pontiff no return.
KilometersDavis - February 4, 2012
You know I like puns, that's an unfair bait
But I will stop myself. I will.
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
Rec'd for not even trying with the top of the hair.
hkobb7 - February 4, 2012
Barnacles!
Blackheartnopants - February 4, 2012 via Android app
They have huge penises.
Lycurgus - February 4, 2012
You have penii on the mind
Barnacles, giraffes.
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
Cockbrain
It afflicts millions in Texas every day.
Lycurgus - February 4, 2012
Miami looked at Iowa and thought...
that place churns out NFL ready wide receivers.
rosko - February 4, 2012
Im more curious to see what the Iowa offense does next year
We will finally, FINALLY, know who is really at fault for the offense, KOK or KF.
im also pretty curious to see who goes where. Morehouse listed B. Ferentz, SOUP, and one of OU’s Co-Offensive Coordinators as potential candidates and honestly, i would be happy with any three of those options. im also curious to see if Iowa can snag C. Long as a new QB Coach.
between this and the new D. Coordinator, we have the potential to have a pretty good coaching staff next year, assuming Ferentz can get the job done and doesnt screw it up.
justsomehawkeyefan - February 4, 2012
I'm not sure you can say that for next year
give the new guy at least a year to install their system.
chitownhawkeye - February 4, 2012
I don't know that next year is really the measure you want to use
We’re going to be breaking in several new linemen, probably starting a freshman at RB, and just lost the best receiver in school history. That was going to be a rough year regardless of who was calling the plays.
Also Chuck Long isn’t coming back and I’m not even sure we should want him to. There was a reason he only lasted on Kirk’s staff for one year the last time.
NorseHawk - February 4, 2012
My opinion only
I’m a big fan of Chuck’s work as QB of Iowa football. Not as much a fan of his coaching resume.
txhawkeye - February 4, 2012
Yeah absolutely
He has a legitimate case as the best player in school history and I totally understand why people like him. But unfortunately being a great player does not make you a great coach.
NorseHawk - February 4, 2012
Isiah Thomas
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
Jay Norvell
A former Hawkeye, but I read he was planning to stay at OU.
IAinCA - February 4, 2012
Also runs the spread
And is reportedly committed enough to it that it cost him the Wisconsin job. I think he’s out.
NorseHawk - February 4, 2012
Per the Twitters, there's going to be TWO WR coaches at Miami
Is that unusual in NFL? Seems unusual to me.
mikjones24 - February 4, 2012
One just to handle Brandon Marshall?
If a $200K receiver coach makes a $6M receiver better, I can see that actually making sense.
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
Philbin actuall started with the Packers as
a co-offensive line coach. There are least a few co-position coaches the NFL.
i_love_iowa - February 4, 2012
KOK as End Around Specialist.
Someone was going to make the joke, might as well be me.
SomeJerkPoster - February 4, 2012
Kudo's, beat me to it
Would like to see first play next year called as end-around – but it will have to be somebody faster than the defensive backs for a change…oh who am i kiddin, it never mattered before.
DaaCF - February 4, 2012
They're gonna have 2 QB coaches, too.
Looks like KOK will be the “head” WR coach, and he’ll get an assistant to help him.
i_love_iowa - February 4, 2012
Posting links on this site appears to be impossible.
Whatevers.
i_love_iowa - February 4, 2012
you have to have an existing word or phrase within the link's >< spot
best way is to highlight an existing word and then hit the link button.
therealCatnuts - February 4, 2012
Or just post the URL.
WaterlooChazz - February 4, 2012
You can hit the chain in the comment for links.
If you’re not a fan of using your mouse just put the word you want to hyperlink in quotes, add a colon and paste the URL.
ex. “link”: URL (Just remove the space after the colon)
The Mexican't - February 4, 2012
As to the whole Nate Chandler debate
I have been on both sides of this issue in the past. Chandler, by all traditional metrics, was not a great QB in the standard sense, that is, in his ability to actually pass the ball in a pro-style offense. He was frankly painful to watch, particularly in comparison to what came immediately before and after him.
What he was great at, unquestionably, was leading his team on and off the field and being and effective-to-superb “game manager”, in the classic Trent Dilfer/Craig Krenzel sense of the word.
That 2003 Iowa team is just so hard to peg and is so frequently forgotten that it’s almost criminal. It didn’t have the great run or thrilling ride that the other KF Top 10 teams gave us (2002, 2004, 2009), but that team had a certain heart and moxie that probably exceeded them all. That was the team that really defined the “Bullies of the Big Ten” moniker.
That team so limited athletically on offense that was almost comical. Ramon fucking Ochoa was the top receiver and return man. Think about that! The best athlete on the entire offense was the left tackle, and it really wasn’t even close. That team, with that roster and talent, had absolutely no business winning 10 games and finished in the Top 10 in the nation. Think about that, too. They had a better record and better final ranking than the 2008 squad, arguably the most talented team of the Ferentz era.
I never really appreciated that team, or Chandler, until watching the Michigan game from that year on BTN classics or whatever it’s called. That team was a bunch of absolute maulers. One of the least aesthetically pleasing Iowa teams I can ever remember, but if was traveling down a dark alley at night in some God-forsake, burned-out, post-apocalyptic city of my nightmares, that is, without a doubt, the team that I would want by my side.
Hands down.
i_love_iowa - February 4, 2012
I don't remember them being THAT ugly to watch.
Somewhere, I have a sheet of tickets with each game’s score printed on it, for 2003.
WaterlooChazz - February 4, 2012
They were EXTREMELY ugly offensively, even by Iowa standards.
As successful Iowa teams go, one of the hardest to watch.
But a pretty fun year, in hindsight.
i_love_iowa - February 4, 2012
Chandler did progress over the course of the season....
…..so by the time that team hit the Outback Bowl, he was a decent QB. However, I recall that early that season the offense looked pretty bad a lot of the time. Freddie was tap-dancing all up and down the line looking for non-existent holes, and Chandler was on the wild side, and threw the ball away a lot.
On the other hand, the defense was good and the offense was just good enough. Somehow, by the end of that year, Freddie was running well and Chandler was able to hit open receivers more times than not. In the KF era, Nate was not one of our better QBs, but he was still a whole let better than Jake during a game. Jake always had stats that looked better than his play, but I’d say the opposite was true of Nate. As far as game effectiveness goes, I’d say Nate and Vandy are about equal. Vandy has glowing stats, but Nate had better intangibles.
The Director - February 4, 2012
I will not have anyone speak ill of Razor Ramon Ochoa
NorseHawk - February 4, 2012
HOORAY
12 hours of drunken birthday celebration and then I wake up to this new today. It’s a new era for Hawkeye football and the best birthday present ever!
Hawkeyes - February 5, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Black Heart Gold Pants to post a comment.