In a game the Hawks lost by 29 and could have lost by more, it may surprise you to learn that Iowa actually played almost perfectly for half of the game -- well, at least on one side of the floor. In the first half, Iowa held the high-powered Ohio State offense to just 28 points on 40% shooting, forced seven turnovers, and held the non-Jared Sullinger portion of the Buckeye squad to just 13 points. They fronted Sullinger effectively (at least for a while), mixed in some zone, and took advantage of a hyped-up Carver crowd to hold the Buckeyes to just nine points in the first nine minutes. And if they had managed even a reasonable facsimile of an offense, they very well could have gone into half tied or even ahead. But they didn't. Boy, how they didn't. Iowa didn't make their first field goal until three minutes into the game, made just five field goals in the entire first half and shot 21.7% from the field. The score at half was 28-19, and it took a heroic effort on defense just to keep things that close.
The lion's share of the credit for Iowa's offensive performance goes to Ohio State. They presented Iowa with a level of athleticism and length that the Hawks hadn't seen before. Iowa's players would frequently drive into the lane on a move that, in the past, had led to an open layup or jumper, only to find two or three Buckeyes laying in wait, ready to swipe at the ball. The quickness and organization of the Buckeyes led directly to 12 turnovers in the first half alone, and needless to say it's not a good sign when your offense has more than twice as many turnovers as field goals, as the Hawkeyes had in the first half. The only thing that kept Iowa even remotely close was their ability to get to the free throw line (8-10 in the first half).

And while it would be tempting to say that Iowa's struggles were just due to outstanding defense, there was also the fact that the Hawks played very, very tight. Iowa had several open looks early in the game, including a point-blank layup for Melsahn Basabe off an in-bounds play and a layup on the break by Eric May that they whiffed on. And as the game went on, Iowa continued to have open looks, including a few from three for Matt Gatens and Josh Oglesby, but those looks just didn't go in. It's hard to say what the cause was, but the impression I got was that the Hawks were shooting like they were constantly afraid that someone was about to block their shot (which was not, admittedly, an unreasonable expectation). There were several times in the first half where Iowa would get the ball in the lane for a 5-7 foot shot, and hurriedly clank it short off the front of the rim. There were also several occasions where an Iowa player found himself with a semi-open shot and passed it up, presumably in the hopes of getting a truly open shot. But against a defense as good as Ohio State's, that truly open shot never came, and the clock eventually forced a truly bad shot. I don't want to make it sound like this game was all Iowa missing open shots, because the virtue of Ohio State's defense was that it did convince Iowa's players they had no time or space to shoot, but just for the record, there were clean looks, and they weren't going in on Saturday.
For a while this was an exceptionally ugly game on both sides: the score was 9-9 at the 10:28 mark in the first half. It was inevitable, though, that Ohio State would start scoring with more efficiency, and when they did, Iowa's failure to score early came back to bite them. My impression was that the Hawks expended a tremendous amount of effort on defense in the first half, then had nothing left to give once the second half started. Ohio State opened the second half as follows: three, layup, three, layup, layup, three, two. On Iowa's first seven possessions, the Hawks went 3-7 with two turnovers. After that, the nine point lead had ballooned to 18, and the game felt effectively over.
It may be that the Hawks were a little too psyched up for this game. The fans were certainly excited, almost manic in the first five minutes of the game, but all that energy may have just served to make Iowa more jumpy and nervous than was entirely healthy. The players were able to give about 10 minutes of ultra-high effort, but after that, they started to look physically and mentally spent. Ohio State, by virtue of the fact that a couple of their starters got in foul trouble in the first half and sat out extended minutes, looked fresh as a daisy, and delivered a remarkable onslaught that killed any hope of a comeback and much of the crowd's enthusiasm. I hope returning fans weren't disappointed by the Hawks' effort, though. Iowa is simply not at the level of this Ohio State team right now. And that's fine -- not many teams in the country are. It would have taken a lot going right for us and a lot going wrong for them for this game to go Iowa's way. That doesn't mean the team isn't making progress or that it's the same team that got blown out by Creighton and Clemson.
For one, Creighton and Clemson didn't have lottery pick NBA power forwards on their teams (although Doug McDermott is pretty darn good). I'm sure Iowa fans were bummed about the outcome, but they did at least get to see a rare basketball talent on Saturday. It reminded me a little of when Glenn Robinson came to Carver and dropped thirty-odd points on the Hawks without breaking a sweat, in the sense that it was abundantly clear that one of these players was at a completely other level. Iowa didn't provide the sternest defense test for Sullinger, but he certainly looked very impressive, making shots from inside and outside with exquisite touch and causing Iowa a great deal of difficulty with his quick hands on defense. I even wonder if the concerns about his height are a tad overblown, given his NBA quality depth -- he's sort of like Tim Duncan in that he's built like a tree trunk and uses that to shield defenders from his shot (and to set a few semi-legal ass screens for driving teammates). He seems to compare well to Luis Scola on the low end and maybe Kevin Love on the high end -- and that's pretty damn good! He's not a defensive stopper, but it's hard to imagine him not scoring 20 and 10 for somebody in the NBA next year.
The Hawks had to contend with the full force of that talent, not to mention Deshaun Thomas, William Buford, Aaron Craft, and several waves of "reserves" who are all, themselves, top recruits, and they didn't have the stamina to match all of that. Their evident nerves didn't help, but this was a pretty clear mismatch from the start. The one thing going forward that may concern Fran McCaffery is that Ohio State figured out a pretty effective defensive strategy against the Hawks and that other teams might copy it: it's nothing novel, but sag off of the three-point line, send an extra defender or two to cut off all drives to the paint, and don't foul. Iowa relies on Marble, Gatens, McCabe and Cartwright getting in the paint for short twos and foul shots, and the Hawks showed a startling inability to pass when confronted with help defense in the paint. Not every team will have the quickness of Ohio State, of course, but many teams will watch this tape and pack the lane just like the Buckeyes did.
1 recs | 37 comments
This really wasn't much of a surprise
when you consider the big picture after our two road wins. Ohio St. is simply on another level right now. Its just unfortunate that this had to be our opponent coming home off of those two wins with that crowd support.
I just hope that fan support continues, and it didn’t turn anyone away. This isn’t the same kind of bad loss as in recent years.
isHawkeye - January 9, 2012
OSU defense was better than I thought..
You are absolutely right. There were three of them around the ball every single time we drove the lane and our unwillingness to take the outside shot played right into their hands…
Sullinger is a good player and I enjoy watching him work down low – although I think he got away with two egregious offensive fouls in the second half – which would have fouled him out. It wouldn’t have been a difference maker at that point in the game, but may have gotten the crowd back into it and made things a little more interesting..
coltranemonk - January 9, 2012
On the foul part, what sort were you seeing?
I recall a couple blatant over the backs that never got called, once in each half that stand out.
BStylin Hawkye - January 9, 2012
Twice in the space of about 5 minutes..
Sullinger got the ball in the post, took a couple of bump dribbles, then lowered his shoulder and plowed into the defender – who went flying both times. The defender (it was Brommer at least once and may have been both times) went flying. While I don’t doubt that Brommer exaggerated the contact, it was significant contact and Sullinger was the aggressor and did not allow his defender to defend – pushing right through him.
coltranemonk - January 9, 2012
I do remember one of the plays your talking about.
The ref on the baseline raised his hands and shoulders in an “Oh well” gesture
BStylin Hawkye - January 9, 2012
Yeah, that was total horseshit.
But not why Iowa lost the game.
YouCanPutYourEddsInIt - January 9, 2012
No. Even had he fouled out..
(he ended with 3 and those two could have made 5) it was far too little to late to make a difference..
coltranemonk - January 9, 2012
Is .373 a good 3-point percent?
This is what Oglesby is shooting, and every play-by-play guy is calling him a “sharp shooter” I don’t think he has earned the status yet. Maybe its because every time its brought up he misses his next shot from 3.
hawkeye0485 - January 9, 2012
It's pretty decent
Generally 40% is terrific, 35% is ok, and anything below 33% you shouldn’t shoot. For being as touted as he his, he should probably be shooting better, but he’s a freshman.
StewMonkey13 - January 9, 2012
Alas, any team with a competent big man has Iowa by the balls.
YouCanPutYourEddsInIt - January 9, 2012
As our big man is struggling
Yes.
mikjones24 - January 9, 2012
I miss the days when Iowa had guys like that.
RossWB - January 9, 2012
Is that an extremely blurry picture of Reggie Evans doing something naughty?
therealCatnuts - January 9, 2012
It's a screenshot of Reggie Evans grabbing Chris Kaman's crown jewels.
RossWB - January 9, 2012
Where have you gone, Reggie Eh-eh-vans...?
YouCanPutYourEddsInIt - January 9, 2012
We seemed to have to go Juco to get them in the last decade
Evans
Jaacks
Hansen
How many good big guys since Bowen have we had that were true Iowa recruits? Brunner is the only one I can think of. (And I hearted Greg Brunner immensely, I would love more guys like that in my Hawk hoopyball future)
therealCatnuts - January 9, 2012
A team full of Brunners would be awesome.
Not the most physically gifted (but still pretty damn good), but you can’t deny the guy’s heart and effort and desire to win.
Swarley - January 9, 2012
I think it is really hard to recruit solid big guys
Big guys tend to be late bloomers and identifying the ones that will really bloom into good players at 17 or 18 years old is very difficult. I think a lot of great big guys end up JUCO just because they need those few years to grow into their bodies. Not saying that we shouldn’t be trying to get guys in out of HS but I don’t think the JUCO route is a terrible option for the big boys.
SaturdayMorningKegStanzis - January 9, 2012
I have to think it was pretty evident in HS that Evans was going to be a stud
and that Jaacks was going to be good, but both were dumb as a wall and wouldn’t make NCAA freshman score standards. But in general, I think you’re correct. It is very, very, rare to find guys that are polished like Howard, Oden, Griffin, or Sullinger at 18 years old.
therealCatnuts - January 9, 2012
Yeah, coordination is fleeting for taller people
especially at younger ages.. I am 6’7 and I really didn’t grow into myself until i was at least 20.
SaturdayMorningKegStanzis - January 9, 2012
I'm 6'5" and I didn't stop getting taller until I was 24
Coordination was definitely fleeting early on.
therealCatnuts - January 9, 2012
Walking and chewing gum..
tougher than advertised.
SaturdayMorningKegStanzis - January 9, 2012
I completely agree that the crowd served to make them jumpy
but that’s to be expected with the first game of any real energy in that building for almost every kid on the team. I just hope that fans don’t stop coming now because the only way for the kids to adjust to that new phenomenon is to keep experiencing it.
I loved the defense I saw in that first half (especially the first few minutes) and thought the Hawks did a fantastic job of getting the Buckeyes in foul trouble early on. The only problem was that as soon as they got in the bonus (with almost 10 minutes left in the half) they began settling for jumpers and quick threes. There was absolutely an opportunity missed at surgically removing their best players via foul trouble in the name of playing a finesse game.
In the end, despite the 2 L’s to their record, Ohio State will almost surely be the best team Iowa faces this season (and may very well be the best team anyone plays this season). I’m still totally psyched for this B1G season after what I’ve seen through the first four games. If Fran can coach like I think he can, the Hawkeyes are going to be a pain in everyone’s ass all season…except Ohio State’s.
Kyle McCann't - January 9, 2012
That was really frustrating. Even moreso because Iowa was ice cold from the field; why did our guys suddenly think they were going to start making all those pull-up jumpers?
RossWB - January 9, 2012
I have a hard time thinking another team is going to be as good as OSU this year
Their only real downside is that they’re very young. But really, they don’t look immature out there except for when they let themselves get into foul trouble early. Fix that and they’re clear March favorites IMO.
therealCatnuts - January 9, 2012
"I have a hard time thinking another team is going to be as good as OSU this year "
In the Big Ten? No. Elsewhere? Sure. Kentucky and North Carolina look awfully good. Syracuse too.
RossWB - January 9, 2012
I'm thinking more along the lines of a stretch run for the NCAAs
Their depth at big men is going to do very well for them, that usually goes very well in March.
therealCatnuts - January 9, 2012
I thought they were deeper in the wings/backcourt than at big men.
They looked bad earlier this year when Sullinger had to miss some time.
RossWB - January 9, 2012
I think they're pretty damn deep in talent at the frontcourt
Nobody is throwing out Phi Slamma Jamma anymore, and even one dominant big man is an enormous advantage in college since even average ones jump early to make $6M/yr in the NBA because there’s also a dearth there.
therealCatnuts - January 9, 2012
Sullinger is great, but I just don't see a ton of depth there.
Compare them to a team like Kentucky that has Anthony Davis, Terrence Jones, and Michael Kidd-Gilchrist. UNC has Hensen and Zeller up front.
RossWB - January 9, 2012
One interesting thing on the foul situation
I really do think this was a key part of Fran’s strategy — get OSU’s stars in foul trouble and then go from there. Rewatching the first half, I noticed that when Sullinger got his first foul, they panned to Fran and you could see him holding up a finger and saying “One. One.” As in, “we’ve got one on him, now let’s just get two more and we’ll be in business.”
Unfortunately, those extra fouls never came, and OSU’s subs were more than capable of holding their own when Sullinger, Thomas and Craft did go out.
I actually think Iowa was really trying to not play a finesse game, that they were trying to get into the paint and draw fouls, but Ohio State packed the paint with three or four guys and made it impossible. The jump-shots were not ideal, but they were probably the best shots we were going to get on many of those possessions. Either that or we needed people cutting off the ball when their big men went to help in the paint — somebody had to have been open.
Horace E. Cow - January 9, 2012
Reality Check
I don’t think the loss will affect team support much. Remember that this game was on a Saturday afternoon, with mild weather, in mid January. That alone will boost attendance. And going in, regardless of the outcome, did anybody really think we were in the hunt for more than a solid middle of the pack finish in the B1G?
It truly sucks to watch the guys get their ass kicked by 29 when we were hoping they’d make a game of it, but that’s what happens when a top tier team faces an average team having a below average day. This team is Iowa football in 2000…. better than the year before but not yet ready for prime time.
Flakbait - January 9, 2012
So with that analogy we're a Final Four team in 2013-14. I'll take it!
therealCatnuts - January 9, 2012
As long as we agree
that after that the analogy breaks. Or after 2015-2016. Either way.
Flakbait - January 9, 2012
I'll take at the minimum an NCAA appearance every year after that without complaint
Sure, the haters will be out because it’s been a while “since we were even Elite 8!” I won’t be one of them.
therealCatnuts - January 9, 2012
We need Basabe to get over himself and start playing hard every game
Can’t have him keep doing this – a few solid games (Boise, Purdue, Wisconsin) followed by one or two complete eggs. He’s a good player, has lots of bounce in his step, has seemed to increase the range on his jumper in the off-season (he’s knocked down more than a few of those 16-17 footers this year), but we need consistency. He was in full-on pout mode early in the second half, and seemed to do that in the Minnesota game as well. I don’t think he played after his ill-timed shot early in the second half. Seemed like his head wasn’t in the game.
A friend of mine works in sports info at Iowa and he told me over the summer that a few people were worried that last year went to Basabe’s head. Hopefully that hasn’t happened.
This was a wake-up call. I just hope the fans don’t bail. OSU is just better than us right now. People just need to keep some perspective – this is a tough stretch of games coming up, and several people here warned that this might happen the next 4 or 5 games. It’s great to have the team relevant again. It feels great. But we’re not there yet.
Nickhawk08 - January 9, 2012
"I just hope the fans don’t bail"
This is the only thing I’m concerned with after this game.
isHawkeye - January 9, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Black Heart Gold Pants to post a comment.